Ilona Nickels
About Ilona         
Ilona's Blog         
Audience Feedback         
Capitol Corner         
Q's and A's         
Recommended Reading          
"Why Congress Matters"         
3rd Edition Now Available       

Contact Ilona         

Accountability of Elected Officials
Career Paths to Congress
Chaplains in the U.S. Congress
House Ethics Process
House/Senate Differences
Lame Duck Congress: Attendance and Voting
Members of Congress: A Job Description
Members of Congress: Who Do They Represent?
Oath of Office for Members of Congress
Pledge of Allegiance: Standing for the Pledge
Pledge of Allegiance: Use in Congress
Qualifications to Run for Congress
Senate: 50-50 Split?
Senate Majority Leader: A Job Description
Sessions of Congress: Lengths
Size of House and Senate
Speaker of the House: a Job Description
Amending the Constitution
Constitutionality of Legislation
August Recesses
First Congress
GOP: Origins of Term
Ideology: Left or Right
Lame Duck Congress: Definition
Party Animals: the Donkey and the Elephant
Statue of Freedom
U.S. Citizenship Test
Amendment Tree in the Senate
Changing a Law
Conference Committees: In Decline
Conference Committees: Procedures
“Deem and Pass” Procedure
Executive Orders
Holds in the Senate
How to Find Basic Legislative Information
How to Keep Up With Congress
Types of Legislation

Capitol Corner

Constitutionality of Legislation

Is there any type of formal procedure within Congress that evaluates the constitutionality of proposed legislation?

Constitutionality of Legislation by Ilona NickelsThere is no formal procedure on behalf of Congress overall to determine the constitutionality of proposed bills.

During floor debate in both the House and Senate, the constitutionality of a proposal is often brought up as a debating point by both proponents and opponents when they feel it is applicable. Raising the question of constitutionality may or may not prove to be persuasive in the debate.

In the Senate, Senators may raise an actual point of order that an amendment or a provision of a bill is unconstitutional. Senate rules require the Presiding Officer to put this question to the Senate for a vote, and not to rule directly on the question of constitutionality. The Senate's collective judgment by its vote of the moment decides whether or not the amendment or provision is constitutional in the view of the majority of the Senate at that time.

The House has no similar procedure. In essence, by voting on the adoption of an amendment or voting on final passage of a bill whose constitutionality has been challenged in debate, they are rendering a judgment on constitutionality. It is the rare Member who would vote yea on a bill they sincerely thought was unconstitutional.

Since a majority vote alone decides the opinion of each chamber on the question of constitutionality of a proposal, it is conceivable that the House may decide a provision is unconstitutional, while the Senate decides the opposite. One chamber will have to cede to the opinion of the other in order to produce agreement on a final version to send to the President.

The ultimate barometer of constitutionality of laws enacted by Congress lies with the courts, and ultimately with the Supreme Court. Bills enacted by Congress and signed into law by the President may have their constitutionality challenged in the courts. And if a law is so challenged, it is the Supreme Court that has the last word on deciding constitutionality.