Ilona Nickels
About Ilona         
Ilona's Blog         
Audience Feedback         
Capitol Corner         
Q's and A's         
Recommended Reading         
"Why Congress Matters"         
3rd Edition Now Available       

Contact Ilona         

Accountability of Elected Officials
Career Paths to Congress
Chaplains in the U.S. Congress
House Ethics Process
House/Senate Differences
Lame Duck Congress: Attendance and Voting
Members of Congress: A Job Description
Members of Congress: Who Do They Represent?
Oath of Office for Members of Congress
Pledge of Allegiance: Standing for the Pledge
Pledge of Allegiance: Use in Congress
Qualifications to Run for Congress
Senate: 50-50 Split?
Senate Majority Leader: A Job Description
Sessions of Congress: Lengths
Size of House and Senate
Speaker of the House: a Job Description
Amending the Constitution
Constitutionality of Legislation
August Recesses
First Congress
GOP: Origins of Term
Ideology: Left or Right
Lame Duck Congress: Definition
Party Animals: the Donkey and the Elephant
Statue of Freedom
U.S. Citizenship Test
Amendment Tree in the Senate
Changing a Law
Conference Committees: In Decline
Conference Committees: Procedures
“Deem and Pass” Procedure
Executive Orders
Holds in the Senate
How to Find Basic Legislative Information
How to Keep Up With Congress
Types of Legislation

Capitol Corner

Size of House and Senate

Why do we have 100 Senators and 435 Members of the House? Can these numbers be changed?

Size of House and Senate by Ilona NickelsThe number of Senators is set by the Constitution and cannot be changed without amending that document. The size of the Senate is established by Article I, section 3 of the Constitution, which states: "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . " The Senate has had 100 Members since the admission of Hawaii into the Union in 1959.

The number of Representatives is set by statute and could be changed with the passage of a new public law. The House has had 435 Members since 1911, when concerns over space and the quality of deliberations among so many representatives led to the establishment of a membership cap.

Section 2 of Amendment XIV to the Constitution states that "Representatives shall be apportioned among the states according to their numbers. . . " Various rulings of the Supreme Court over the years have interpreted this to mean Congressional districts should have as equal a population as possible. The Constitution also states that each state shall have at least one Representative, no matter how small its population.

Because of the Constitutional requirement that equity be maintained in the population size of each district, state legislatures must reapportion their state's population by redrawing congressional district lines every 10 years, after the results of the national Census are known. Based on the 2000 Census, the 435 statutory cap on membership in the House means each Representative has, on average, close to 650,000 constituents.

The state with the largest population, California, has 53 Representatives in Congress, while seven states with small populations have only 1 Representative for the entire state. The states with so-called "At Large" Representatives are: Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming.

Once the 2010 Census has been completed, another round of apportionment will begin. You can find the data used for reapportionment after the 2000 Census on the U.S. Census Bureau congressional apportionment website.

As the size of the constituency each Member must represent has steadily increased since then, there has been some discussion about increasing the overall size of the House of Representatives. However, more Members would also mean expanding existing office buildings and perhaps even necessitate renovations to the House chamber in the Capitol. Given the cost-conscious environment surrounding Congress in recent years, and especially now, it is unlikely that proposals to spend additional money on Congress itself would be seen as politically viable at this time.

When Congress began in 1789, there were only 65 Members in the House, and 26 in the Senate. The original 65 Representatives each had just over 30,000 constituents.

Larry Sabato, Director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, has written an excellent piece advocating for an increase in the size of the House of Representatives, in order to lower the Member-to-constituent ratio. You can read it on the website of “Democracy, a Journal of Ideas."